Broader vote needed

 

The long drawn out debate about Ender Ilkay’s proposed development has revealed much about our elected officials. It has also generated more questions than answers. For those not familiar with this scheme, it proposes a long string of cabins right next to a provincial park where a popular hiking trail is located. This trail is famous;  it is well used by people from all over the province and beyond. Of course, a major zoning change would also be needed.

First, how much careful thought and sound judgment were put into this plan? Could a developer not foresee the controversy it would create? Would it not put those who favor slow,well planned and careful development in an embarrassing dilemma and disillusion them? Could the main goal just be a change in zoning?

A unique supportive argument has been put forth for this plan. The claim is that a person has the right to do whatever he wants on his own property, regardless of what anyone else thinks. Now, I’ve heard of the divine right of kings. Such ‘rights’ were done away with several centuries ago. I suggest that the ‘divine rights’ of property owners also should be relegated to the distant past-perhaps the  time before the 16th century.

Apparently much decision making power concerning this plan has been thrust on our local Land Use Committee (LUC). Let’s look at its makeup. All members come from thinly populated areas. Two became members through acclamation. One, from East Sooke, was appointed. While Mr. Hicks was within his rights to do so,  in my opinion, this appointee does not represent East Sooke fairly.

At a recent meeting  of LUC on this development proposal, I thought that the director became very defensive when questioned about this matter. He was, I thought, also defensive about the blatant disconnect between the majority of the audience and the majority of this committee.

In my opinion, both his attitude and the rambling remarks from a couple of his committee members make me ask another question. Are all members of  this group of people up to dealing with a topic as important as this one? Isn’t  the protection of this province-famous park something that should be dealt with by those with broader views and wider experience?

Dale W. Read

East Sook

Just Posted

The strange case of Jesokah Adkens

All was not what it seemed in Sooke girl’s disappearance 18 years ago

Victoria Police host Faith-Based Safety Forum in light of recent religious attacks

More than 35 faith-based leaders voice concerns, air questions

Kelowna toddler suffers cracked skull after fall from balcony

Neighbour who found the two-year-old boy said he has a bump the size of a golf ball on his head

Baby boom seniors putting pressure on B.C. long-term care: report

B.C. leads Canada in growth of dementia, dependence on care

RCMP probe if teen was intentionally hit with ski pole by mystery skier on B.C. mountain

The incident happened on March 20 on Grouse Mountain. Police are urging witnesses to come forward

Support growing for orphaned Okanagan child after father dies in highway crash

Family thanks emergency crews for assistance in traumatic incident

Pipeline protester chimes in on Justin Trudeau’s B.C. fundraising speech

The government purchased the Trans Mountain pipeline and expansion project for $4.5 billion

UPDATED: B.C. man says he’ll take People’s Party lawsuit as far as he can

Federal judge shut down Satinder Dhillon’s ‘nonsensical’ motion to bar use of PPC name in byelection

Canada stripping citizenship from Chinese man over alleged marriage fraud

The move comes amid severely strained relations between Ottawa and Beijing

Nevada court orders former Vancouver man to pay back $21.7M to investors

The commission says Michael Lathigee committed fraud over a decade ago

Young man on Vancouver Island dies after losing control of ATV

Crash claimed the life of a 23-year-old south of Nanaimo over the long weekend

Most Read