Letters: Land Use Committee gone rogue?

Question is raised about potential conflict of interest around the council table

Open Letter to Mayor and Council:

 

Land use committee, consisting of two developers, one council developer, one wife of builder.

I know that councilors try to remain neutral but when push comes to shove how neutral are they? A developer, who may have pecuniary interest in development property, makes a motion to reduce amenity costs to developers. No one called a point of order but instead went ahead and voted to lower costs to developers with three developers voting. This went to council and was again supported.

Staff recommended that a financial review be carried out before putting this forward, but the majority of council ignored the professionals and with their jaded views voted against the recommendation of staff. I will note here that the land use committee does not contact staff for clarification or query in any way the information given them or give advice, rather they grandstand at meetings and waste valuable staff time and everyone’s time.

Why do we have the professional staff and pay them so well and then ignore their recommendations or choose not to confer with them? They either have the answers or access to them.

I supported and asked that there be a land use committee to speed up process, by hearing from the community and dealing with concerns before projects came to council. Instead the land use committee has become an arena for committee members to harass and belittle staff. Somehow, when elected, the members are now the professionals with all the knowledge and the developers know exactly what should be done, they even write the bylaws which are passed by council. Something wrong here? You bet.

Council approved their strategic plan to be fiscally responsible and to build a vibrant downtown and with one full swoop, in the vote for amenities, they voted to perhaps increase taxes  so developers pay less and voted to decrease costs outside the downtown from $5,000 to $2,000.

Guess where the building will be if any? Langford is down by 50 per cent in building permits. It stands to reason that the economy for building in Sooke  will be even worse. We have witnessed the downturn here in the late 80’s when many truck drivers, sold their trucks, excavators etc. and some even moved out of the country. The building industry is like that and the economy is down and that is a reality. We all do with less if working for ourselves, retail or developers. It happened in the 20’ and the 30’s. The banksters continue to make money as they lend out money and receive interest and we do without but must pay the banks.

Developers will need to find the market niches and survive or fall. Council is not here to subsidize the businesses, with taxpayer money. Council appears to be tough on groups looking to subsidize their incomes and developers are businesses, so keep on being tough and build our

community slowly and with respect for the people and the land.

Regards for a healthy community

Ellen Lewers

Sooke

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

Saanich Police respond to petition for new police agency on Lindsay Buziak murder case

Petition asks Public Safety Minister to to help find justice for slain realtor

Third time lucky for Freedom Mobile cell tower in Sooke

Council approves tower after cell provider applies multiple times

Petition calls for suspension of Victoria councillor Ben Isitt

Isitt says petition ‘does not provide a reliable barometer of public opinion’

Grave site at Ross Bay Cemetery vandalized overnight

Graffiti found on grave of Sir James Douglas

T’Sou-ke First Nation mired in legal woes over gas station development

Claims and counterclaims leave sub-contractors unpaid

Health officials confirm sixth COVID-19 case in B.C.

Woman remains in isolation as Fraser Health officials investigate

Study says flu vaccine protected most people during unusual influenza season

Test-negative method was pioneered by the BC Centre for Disease Control in 2004

Saskatchewan and B.C. reach championship round at Scotties

British Columbia’s Corryn Brown locked up the last berth in Pool B

Resident discovers five discarded hog heads in Vancouver Island ditch

WARNING: Graphic image may be upsetting to some readers

Canadian Premier League announces 2020 home dates for eight-team circuit

Pacific FC hosts FC Edmonton on April 11 in Langford

B.C. lawyer, professor look to piloting a mental-health court

In November, Nova Scotia’s mental-health court program marked 10 years of existence

COLUMN: Not an expert on First Nations government structures? Then maybe you should calm down

Consider your knowledge about First Nations governance structures before getting really, really mad

Meet the Wet’suwet’en who want the Coastal GasLink pipeline

Supporters of the pipeline are upset only one side is being heard nationwide

Most Read