Open letter in regard to boat launch

Dear Mr. Parliament

CAO Evan Parliament, District of Sooke

Dear Mr. Parliament;

 

On this day, August 10, 2011, I demand that the District of Sooke cease expending funds on the ‘Boat Launch Project’ until certain issues are clarified.

It would seem that in the matter of the public boat launch, the District of Sooke is guilty of a breach of public trust; and of fraudulently representing the value of the boat launch to the motorized-boating public. Assurance was given that ample parking would be available, and that vehicles and trailers would be accommodated.  Sooke would once again have a public boat launch for the fishing community.

Not only was the boating public given that assurance, but those who administered the Building Canada Fund-Communities Component, were also given the same assurance. All documents, the application report to the Building Canada Fund, Sooke Zoning Bylaw 416, and Development Permit #PLN00726,  make mention of parking for vehicles and trailers.

Specifically, Bylaw 416 and DP#PLN00726 state that no less than 19 spaces be available for truck/trailer parking. In detail there were to be 12 spaces at 40 feet; eight spaces at 33 feet; one space at 29.5 feet; and two trailer only spaces, for a total of 23.

Measurements carried out of August 7, 2011, found the following: eight spaces at 26.5 feet + 7.5 feet of sidewalk (34 feet); four spaces at 21 feet + 7.5 feet of sidewalk (28.5 feet); six spaces at 22.5 feet + 7.5 feet of sidewalk (30 feet); and two spaces for cars, for a total of 20.

We trailer a 19-ft Glassply behind a 3/4 ton pick-up and require 42 1/2 feet of parking space.  We also trailer a 12-ft aluminum boat with the same truck, and would require 34 feet to park.

The parking required in both district legal documents has not been provided. It is obvious that the boat launch will never be the amenity promised in return for the expenditure on the property. Yes, car-toppers, kayaks and canoes will perhaps use the site, but these are not the craft used by fishermen in local waters. The much-touted draw for tourism and world class fishing was simply a means to win support for the hotel.  The boat launch project and the property purchase  were part of the ‘Agreement’ with Prestige Hotel and they will be the sole beneficiary.

The Development Permit has been breached in a number of ways: failure to provide the parking as per the DP; the requirement for a grasscrete surface on the parking areas; the changes to the layout at the waters edge for the turn around, the failure on the properties to indicate in any way the change in property lines given by subdivision.  In fact at the time the subdivision was put to paper, we were told that would provide the necessary parking.

I also have in my possession a series of staff e-mails which make it clear that there is a short-fall of at least $440,000 needed to complete the project, and some interesting suggestions as to how to put the numbers to council. Some of the contents read as follows:

“An error at the outset of the project where the 200K from Prestige for the pier was misallocated. 100K for the unexpected costs of the boat launch land based works The key is – have we been authorized by council to do the work we are doing and spending the funds we propose to do… Just want everyone to be aware that this could be a major criticism of staff if it is not clear to council and the public.

Also – we must ensure that the whole boat launch and boardwalk will be public property. And we must ensure that we have amended our tenure licence and grant application if necessary.”

It is also obvious that a new contract has been awarded, or is to be awarded, to Heavy Metal, to do with the installation of the pier and boardwalk.

This project must not continue until these issues are put before the public and all questions answered. This should not be about providing amenities for Prestige Hotel. It must be about accountability and responsibility to the taxpaying public.

Gail Hall

Sooke

Editor’s note: Read Evan

Parliament’s response on page 11

Just Posted

Rugby Canada helps recovery efforts in Japan after typhoon cancels final match

Canadian players wanted to “give back in whatever small way they could”

Victoria feels the pinch at the pump as gas prices jump 18 cents

Gas up to 157.9 cents per litre at some stations

‘Panda’ Goodlife runner searches for his head

Facebook post for help leads to ‘unconfirmed panda head sightings’

Former child care worker charged with Saanich sexual assault pleads guilty

Jesse Doig arrested in May, remaining in custody since

For Central Saanich couple, fight against MS is a matter of family

Altenkirks sell greeting cards and wooden bowls to raise money for MS Society

WATCH: Greater Victoria’s top stories of the day

A round-up of the day’s top stories

UPDATE: British couple vacationing in Vancouver detained in U.S. after crossing border

CBP claims individuals were denied travel authorization, crossing was deliberate

After losing two baby boys, B.C. parents hope to cut through the taboo of infant death

Oct. 15 is Pregnancy and Infant Loss Awareness Day in B.C.

Cheating husband sues mistress for gifted ring after wife learns about affair

The husband gave his mistress $1,000 to buy herself a ring in December 2017

POLL: Do you think the day of the federal election should be a statutory holiday?

Increasing voter turnout has long been a goal of officials across the… Continue reading

B.C. massage therapist reprimanded, fined for exposing patients’ breasts

Registered massage therapist admits professional misconduct

B.C. boosts legal aid funding in new payment contract

‘Duty counsel’ service restored in some communities, David Eby says

VIDEO: Bear spies on cyclists riding by on Campbell River street

Riders seem unaware the bruin is mere feet away on the side of the road

Two Cowichan Tribes families devastated by duplex fire

Carla Sylvester sat in her vehicle, on Tuesday morning, with tears in… Continue reading

Most Read